Halo 3's Campaign...Bad?? *Chuckles* I beg to differ. Sure, we all have our own opinion about the Halo games campaign levels, but Halo 3's Campaign was awesome. It was like Halo and Halo 2 in 1 totally awesome game! It had Halo's great story line (not the same one, but just as good) and Halo 2's awesome graphics (for the time it was created, they were great). Halo 2 had a great story aswell, but I think that the Arbitors levels sort of cut the campaign into shreads. It was, at times, far to confusing. Halo on the other hand had a great, solid campaign story, but poor graphics compaired to todays graphics. Halo 3 had the good of Halo and Halo 2. How could it be bad?
Possibly you didn't enjoy it because it latched far too much on Halo CE's story? Or possibly the fact Sergant Johnson dies? Or its just another cliff hanger? In my opinion, Its best Johnson died, and its best that Halo 3 ended in another clif hanger. Sergant Johnson dieing really made the Halo universe what it is. The sacrafice of a true hero, for the greater good of Human kind. Its just like Saving Private Ryan. CPT. Miller (Tom Hanks) died at the end of the movie. It sent a very powerful message to the audiance.
As for Halo 3's cliff hanger ending, its best that way. It leaves the rest up to the imagination. its, in a way, like Star Wars (Episodes 4,5 and 6). Epesode 6 ends the star Wars Saga, but not really. What happens to Han Solo, the Princess and Chewy afterwords? Its the same with Luke. You have no clue, but you like to leave it up to the imagination.
Anyways, Spielberg isn't wrighting the movie. He may be the Exec. Producer. but hes only on boared if the Halo movie(s) go into full out production.