Howdy. The reasons that the U.S. military does not put STF technology into production are many. The biggest reasons are cost and reliability.
Reliability is a crucial point of any equipment used by the military. Though some products may perform better in perfect conditions, the contract will always go to the product that can do slightly less in the worst conditions. The point here is that STF may work in theory, practical application is plagued by field issues, ranging from weather and the enemy to a confused private who doesn't know how to take care of his gear.
The second reason is cost. Right now, the US Army is locked on a battle with senators who are not happy with the current M-16 and M-4 series rifles. While the senators and other political groups pressure the Army to upgrade their weapons to make them more reliable, an Army-wide change of small-arms weapons systems would be expensive to say the least. While the military must continually upgrade its weapons and armor to meet ever-rising threats, the current weapons and armor does the job well enough to justify saving money on better models. Suffice it to say that an armor design revolution would only occur if the proposed design would far surpass the current armor performance. I'll finish this later- I'm going to sleep.
P.S.- the ballistic gel used in Mythbusters is not meant to stop bullets as much as it is built to simulate ballistic effects on soft targets such as human tissue. This ballistic gel can't be used as armor, since it is more akin to a giant block of JELL-O.
Reliability is a crucial point of any equipment used by the military. Though some products may perform better in perfect conditions, the contract will always go to the product that can do slightly less in the worst conditions. The point here is that STF may work in theory, practical application is plagued by field issues, ranging from weather and the enemy to a confused private who doesn't know how to take care of his gear.
The second reason is cost. Right now, the US Army is locked on a battle with senators who are not happy with the current M-16 and M-4 series rifles. While the senators and other political groups pressure the Army to upgrade their weapons to make them more reliable, an Army-wide change of small-arms weapons systems would be expensive to say the least. While the military must continually upgrade its weapons and armor to meet ever-rising threats, the current weapons and armor does the job well enough to justify saving money on better models. Suffice it to say that an armor design revolution would only occur if the proposed design would far surpass the current armor performance. I'll finish this later- I'm going to sleep.
P.S.- the ballistic gel used in Mythbusters is not meant to stop bullets as much as it is built to simulate ballistic effects on soft targets such as human tissue. This ballistic gel can't be used as armor, since it is more akin to a giant block of JELL-O.